Judging by the reaction of the books and
the first film of the trilogy, The Hunger Games, by Suzanne Collins, has
been an unqualified success. However, it
has also caused a bit of debate, owing to its subject
matter. It is about our society in the distant future, at least 74 years hence. What do the Games consist of? Each
of the twelve districts of North America is required to choose, by lottery, one
boy and one girl between the ages of 12 and 18.
These are sent to the Capitol, where they are placed in a stadium that
has been transformed to look like a forest.
Once inside, the “tributes” must fight to the death. The last one standing wins food for life, in
a world where food is lacking for the vast majority, except in the Capitol.
The theme is rather heavy for the intended audience,
being written primarily for teenagers. However,
the author does not describe the violence in graphic detail, and at the same
time the reader never loses the sense of anguish that the protagonists feel in
the “game” – a world class euphemism if there ever was one.
Why is it the new 1984? Sixty-three
years ago, George Orwell published a book in which he revealed his idea of how
the world might be in the aforementioned year. It is easy to see that he was largely correct,
failing mostly in choosing the timeframe. In the end, it is a criticism of the world in
which Orwell lived.
It is this book that gave us the poorly named “Big
Brother.” This program is nothing more
than a human zoo, full of argumentative, bad tempered people. By the way, why do they call it a “reality
show” when it has nothing to do with reality?
The participants are not allowed to do anything – read, use a computer,
watch television, play games, listen to music, go to work, e.g. anything that a
normal person would do. With no other
options, they fall into a pattern of gossip, argument, and shouting among
themselves, until at least one breaks down in tears in the confession room or a
bed or wherever, all so the spectators can spend an enjoyable evening in front
of the television. I doubt that I am the only one who wonders: How long it will be before someone is killed
in the Big Brother house?
Maybe it is this question that gave birth to the
Hunger Games. I am not sure of the
motives of the author, but we can speculate about them. Instead of children, she could have put
adults in the arena, as we see in a lot of action movies. She could have made it so that the
participants had to be knocked out instead of killed. However, I believe that
she wanted to create a highly charged situation, to warn that this could be the
future of mankind if we do not do something about it. Maybe it will not be exactly like the book,
nor with children, but is it so difficult to imagine a deadly reality show
within the next 25 or 50 years, if that long?
Obviously it would not be the first time that a
society enjoyed such a spectacle. Ask any
Christian during the Roman Empire, for example.
We would like to think that we have evolved beyond that as a society,
but I am not sure that we have.
I am not one to burn or prohibit books. For this reason I have not prevented anyone in
my family to read it. What I do want,
once it has been read, is that the reader think about the repercussions,
especially for a Christian. Therefore,
the question is:
What would a Christian do, once chosen to participate
in the Hunger Games?
